artificial intelligence (7)

Allegory...

13641320665?profile=RESIZE_710x

Why is Plato's Allegory of the Cave Still Relevant? Source: A Change For Better

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Civics, Civilization, Democracy, Existentialism, Fascism

This is another conversation with Claude.ai that I found enlightening. It allows me to experiment with artificial intelligence and pose questions that I hope are carefully thought through, to see how the app analyzes contemporary society. I've changed the format to more conversational, and less like speaking to an automaton. My question below the title is deliberately rendered in italics. As the blog post title suggests, I was looking for an allegory between what humans have experienced in the past and what we're experiencing now.

Myths, Power, and Billionaire Parallels

Do you see a correlation between the Greek and Roman gods and modern-day billionaires? Were the myths and legends allegorical references to the ancient elites?

The parallels between ancient mythological figures and modern wealthy elites are striking, though the relationship is more complex than direct allegory.

Ancient myths often reflect the social and political realities of their time. The Greek and Roman gods displayed many characteristics we associate with powerful elites: they were capricious, competitive, prone to excess, and operated by different rules than ordinary mortals. Zeus’s serial infidelities, the gods’ petty rivalries, and their casual destruction of human lives when it suited their purposes mirror criticisms often leveled at today’s ultra-wealthy.

However, these weren’t typically direct allegories for specific historical figures. Instead, they represented archetypal patterns of power and human nature that transcend any particular era. The gods embodied both the allure and the dangers of unchecked power - they could be beneficent patrons or destructive forces, often within the same story.

The correlation you’re noticing likely stems from consistent patterns in how concentrated power operates across cultures and centuries. Today’s tech billionaires, reshaping society according to their visions; oil magnates, influencing global politics; or media moguls, controlling the information flow, echo the mythological theme of powerful beings whose personal decisions have vast consequences for ordinary people.

Ancient audiences would have recognized these power dynamics in their societies - wealthy patricians, merchant princes, and political dynasties who seemed to live by different rules. The myths served both as entertainment and as a way to process the reality of extreme inequality and arbitrary power.

So while not literal allegories, these stories do capture enduring truths about how concentrated wealth and power function in human societies, which is why the parallels feel so resonant today.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Read more…

Likelihood...

13640354663?profile=RESIZE_710x

Source: https://youtu.be/m9DmPRO4MPQ?si=PEyFXaHMGP2Wb9-j

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Civilization, Existentialism, Philosophy

To Claude.ai: "What is the likely outcome of the United States and Israel attacking the nation of Iran on suspicion of having nuclear weapons?"

An attack on Iran by the US and Israel would likely have severe and far-reaching consequences across multiple dimensions:

**Regional Military Response**

Iran would likely retaliate through its extensive network of proxy forces across the Middle East, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, various militias in Iraq and Syria, and the Houthis in Yemen. This could trigger a broader regional conflict involving multiple countries and non-state actors.

**Economic Disruption**

Iran could attempt to close or disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of global oil passes. This would cause significant spikes in oil prices and global economic disruption. Iran might also target critical infrastructure in neighboring Gulf states.

**International Relations**

Such an attack would likely strain relationships with key allies, particularly European nations, and could push Russia and China closer to Iran. It might also complicate relationships with regional partners who prefer diplomatic solutions.

**Nuclear Escalation Risk**

Paradoxically, an attack might accelerate rather than prevent Iranian nuclear weapons development, as Iran could withdraw from international agreements and monitoring entirely. Historical precedent suggests that countries under existential threat often prioritize weapons programs.

**Humanitarian Impact**

Military action would likely result in significant civilian casualties and could destabilize an already fragile region, potentially creating refugee crises and further humanitarian challenges.

**Domestic Consequences**

In Iran, an attack could strengthen hardline elements and undermine moderate voices, while potentially rallying the population around the government despite current internal tensions.

The complexity and interconnectedness of Middle Eastern geopolitics make it difficult to contain the effects of such military action, which is why diplomatic solutions are generally preferred by the international community.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Oh, well...

Read more…

Convos with Claude...

13580877482?profile=RESIZE_710x

Image source: University of Central Florida

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Engineering, Computer Modeling, Computer Science

I was intrigued by a Medium article using Claude.ai that posed a question:

"You are a member of the United States Senate Budget Committee. Your task is to design a budget for the next ten years that will produce a budget surplus and, in the long run, eventually permit the United States to pay down its national debt. You may consider any combination of spending and tax policy changes, but you must ensure that these changes have minimal negative impacts on employment, consumer confidence, and investor confidence."

I reused the same question in my query.

Claude produced, for the Medium article, and in my app: "10-Year Budget Surplus Strategy: Critical Analysis & Implementation Plan." It seemed reasonable, and frighteningly rational, in comparison to current government policy proposals, if you can call them that.

Here's my stab at it. Next week, I will literally post my "Out of This World" conversation with Claude. I'll give you background when I post next weekend.

10-Year Budget Surplus Strategy: Critical Analysis & Implementation Plan

Source: Claude.ai

Executive Summary

This analysis presents a fiscally responsible path to budget surplus within 10 years while maintaining economic stability. The strategy combines gradual revenue enhancement, strategic spending optimization, and growth-promoting investments to achieve sustainable debt reduction without triggering economic disruption.

Current Fiscal Landscape Assessment

Baseline Assumptions (2025):

  • Federal deficit: ~$1.8 trillion
  • National debt: ~$34 trillion
  • GDP growth: 2-3% annually
  • Interest rates: 4-5% range
  • Unemployment: ~4%

Critical Challenge: The U.S. faces a structural deficit requiring approximately $200-250 billion in annual deficit reduction to achieve balance, scaling to surplus.

Strategic Framework: The "Gradual Convergence Model"

Phase 1: Stabilization (Years 1-3)

Target: Reduce deficit by 40%

Revenue Enhancement ($400B over 3 years)

  1. Corporate Tax Optimization
    • Raise corporate rate from 21% to 25% (gradual 1.3% annually)
    • Close international tax loopholes (estimated $60B annually)
    • Implement minimum tax on largest corporations
  2. High-Income Tax Adjustments
    • Restore top marginal rate to 39.6% for income >$400K
    • Capital gains parity with ordinary income for >$1M earners
    • Close carried interest loophole
  3. Digital Economy Taxation
    • Implement digital services tax on tech giants
    • Strengthen cryptocurrency transaction reporting

Strategic Spending Optimization ($300B over 3 years)

  1. Defense Efficiency Initiative
    • Reduce weapons system redundancies ($40B annually)
    • Consolidate overseas base operations
    • Maintain personnel and readiness levels
  2. Healthcare Cost Management
    • Medicare drug price negotiation expansion
    • Administrative efficiency improvements
    • Preventive care investment (reduces long-term costs)
  3. Subsidy Rationalization
    • Eliminate fossil fuel subsidies ($20B annually)
    • Means-test agricultural subsidies
    • Reform tax expenditures (mortgage interest deduction caps)

Phase 2: Acceleration (Years 4-7)

Target: Achieve budget balance

Growth-Promoting Investments

  1. Infrastructure Modernization
    • $200B annual investment (self-financing through economic multiplier)
    • Focus on broadband, transportation, green energy grid
    • Estimated 1.5x return on investment over 10 years
  2. Education and Workforce Development
    • Community college partnership expansion
    • STEM education incentives
    • Apprenticeship programs with private sector

Revenue System Modernization

  1. Carbon Pricing Mechanism
    • Gradual implementation starting Year 4
    • Revenue-neutral with tax credits for middle class
    • Estimated $100B annual revenue by Year 7
  2. Financial Transaction Tax
    • Minimal rate (0.1%) on high-frequency trading
    • Estimated $50B annually with minimal market impact

Phase 3: Surplus Achievement (Years 8-10)

Target: Generate 1-2% GDP surplus

Debt Service Optimization

  • Refinance existing debt during favorable rate periods
  • Establish debt ceiling mechanism tied to GDP growth
  • Create automatic stabilizers for economic downturns

Critical Risk Analysis

Economic Stability Safeguards

  1. Employment Protection Measures
    • Gradual implementation prevents shock
    • Infrastructure investment creates jobs
    • Workforce retraining programs for affected sectors
  2. Consumer Confidence Maintenance
    • Middle-class tax stability (no increases for <$200K income)
    • Enhanced EITC and child tax credits
    • Healthcare cost protections
  3. Investor Confidence Assurance
    • Predictable, gradual policy implementation
    • Maintain investment incentives for R&D
    • Clear long-term fiscal trajectory communication

Contingency Mechanisms

  1. Economic Downturn Protocols
    • Automatic spending stabilizers
    • Tax relief triggers during recession
    • Flexible timeline adjustment authority
  2. Political Sustainability
    • Bipartisan deficit reduction commission
    • Automatic implementation unless overridden
    • Performance-based adjustments

Implementation Strategy

Year 1 Priorities

  1. Pass comprehensive tax reform package
  2. Establish infrastructure investment authority
  3. Begin Medicare cost containment measures
  4. Create deficit reduction oversight mechanism

Monitoring Metrics

  • Monthly deficit tracking
  • Quarterly employment and confidence indices
  • Annual GDP growth assessment
  • Debt-to-GDP ratio progression

Long-term Debt Reduction Projection

10-Year Outlook:

  • Year 5: Budget balance achieved
  • Year 8: 1% GDP surplus ($280B annually)
  • Year 10: 2% GDP surplus ($600B annually)
  • Debt reduction: $2-3 trillion over decade
  • Debt-to-GDP ratio: Reduced from 120% to 95%

Critical Success Factors

  1. Gradual Implementation: Prevents economic shock while building momentum
  2. Investment-Led Growth: Infrastructure and education spending drives economic expansion
  3. Broad-Based Approach: Combines revenue and spending measures for sustainability
  4. Automatic Adjustments: Built-in flexibility for economic conditions
  5. Stakeholder Buy-in: Protects middle class while ensuring shared responsibility

Conclusion

This framework provides a realistic path to fiscal sustainability while protecting economic stability. The gradual convergence model balances ambitious deficit reduction with practical implementation, ensuring that fiscal responsibility enhances rather than undermines long-term economic prosperity.

Key Principle: Sustainable deficit reduction requires economic growth, not just spending cuts or tax increases alone. This comprehensive approach positions the United States for long-term fiscal health while maintaining its competitive economic position

Read more…

Agibot vs Optimus...

13354497662?profile=RESIZE_710x

The firm is reported to have produced at least 962 humanoid robots so far. Global Times/Agibot

Topics: Applied Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics

The company has established a “data collection factory” to gather real-world data through activities like folding clothes and doing laundry.

A Chinese robotics firm has started mass-producing humanoid robots for general use, while its US counterparts, like Tesla, are aiming for such a feat in 2026.

Agibot, or Zhiyuan Robotics, showcased footage of its manufacturing facility on its official website and revealed that it’s on course to produce 1,000 units by the end of the year, according to a Chinese online news outlet.

Founded in February 2023 by Peng Zhihui, a former participant in Huawei’s “Genius Youth” program, the Shanghai-based startup launched its first humanoid robot model, the Raise A1, in August 2023.

On August 18, the company introduced five new wheeled and bipedal humanoid robot models designed for various tasks, including domestic chores and industrial work.

First Law:
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

Second Law:
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

Third Law:
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Isaac Asimov, "I, Robot."

China’s Agibot eyes 1,000-strong humanoid robot army to beat Elon Musk’s Optimus, Jijo Malayil, Interesting Engineering

Read more…

AI and the Great Filter...

12545635689?profile=RESIZE_710x

Two researchers have revised the Drake equation, a mathematical formula for the probability of finding life or advanced civilizations in the universe.

University of Rochester. Are We Alone in the Universe? Revisiting the Drake Equation, NASA

Topics: Astrobiology, Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Civilization, SETI

See: Britannica.com/The-Fermi-Paradox/Where-Are-All-The-Aliens

Abstract
This study examines the hypothesis that the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), culminating in the emergence of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), could act as a "Great Filter" that is responsible for the scarcity of advanced technological civilizations in the universe. It is proposed that such a filter emerges before these civilizations can develop a stable, multiplanetary existence, suggesting the typical longevity (L) of a technical civilization is less than 200 years. Such estimates for L, when applied to optimistic versions of the Drake equation, are consistent with the null results obtained by recent SETI surveys, and other efforts to detect various techno-signatures across the electromagnetic spectrum. Through the lens of SETI, we reflect on humanity's current technological trajectory – the modest projections for L suggested here, underscore the critical need to quickly establish regulatory frameworks for AI development on Earth and the advancement of a multiplanetary society to mitigate against such existential threats. The persistence of intelligent and conscious life in the universe could hinge on the timely and effective implementation of such international regulatory measures and technological endeavors.

Is artificial intelligence the great filter that makes advanced technical civilizations rare in the universe? Michael A. Garrett, Acta Astronautica, Volume 219, June 2024, Pages 731-735

Read more…

Fantastic Plastic...

10108593093?profile=RESIZE_710x

Plastic fantastic: this perovskite-based device can be reconfigured and could play an important role in artificial intelligence systems. (Courtesy: Purdue University/Rebecca McElhoe)

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Biology, Computer Science, Materials Science

Researchers in the US have developed a perovskite-based device that could be used to create a high-plasticity architecture for artificial intelligence. The team, led by Shriram Ramanathan at Purdue University, has shown that the material’s electronic properties can be easily reconfigured, allowing the devices to function like artificial neurons and other components. Their results could lead to more flexible artificial-intelligence hardware that could learn much like the brain.

Artificial intelligence systems can be trained to perform a task such as voice recognition using real-world data. Today this is usually done in software, which can adapt when additional training data are provided. However, machine learning systems that are based on hardware are much more efficient and researchers have already created electronic circuits that behave like artificial neurons and synapses.

However, unlike the circuits in our brains, these electronics are not able to reconfigure themselves when presented with new training information. What is needed is a system with high plasticity, which can alter its architecture to respond efficiently to new information.

Device can transform into four components for artificial intelligence systems, Sam Jarman, Physics World

Read more…

Quantum AI...

9858607872?profile=RESIZE_710x

Rutgers researchers and their collaborators have found that learning - a universal feature of intelligence in living beings - can be mimicked in synthetic matter, a discovery that in turn could inspire new algorithms for artificial intelligence (AI). (Courtesy: Rutgers University-New Brunswick)

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science, Materials Science, Quantum Mechanics

Quantum materials known as Mott insulators can “learn” to respond to external stimuli in a way that mimics animal behavior, say researchers at Rutgers University in the US. The discovery of behaviors such as habituation and sensitization in these non-living systems could lead to new algorithms for artificial intelligence (AI).

Neuromorphic, or brain-inspired, computers aim to mimic the neural systems of living species at the physical level of neurons (brain nerve cells) and synapses (the connections between neurons). Each of the 100 billion neurons in the human brain, for example, receives electrical inputs from some of its neighbors and then “fires” an electrical output to others when the sum of the inputs exceeds a certain threshold. This process, also known as “spiking”, can be reproduced in nanoscale devices such as spintronic oscillators. As well as being potentially much faster and energy-efficient than conventional computers, devices based on these neuromorphic principles might be able to learn how to perform new tasks without being directly programmed to accomplish them.

Quantum material ‘learns’ like a living creature, Isabelle Dumé, Physics World

Read more…