All Posts (6403)

Sort by

Hello BSFS *Update* Fated by Chain on Wii U *EXCLUSIVE*

I would like to update BSFS on the development of Fated by Chain for the Nintendo Wii U! Incus has worked very hard on this application, and we would like to give new information with story and images. Incus Interactive Productions LLC were inspired by the designs of action/rpg games of the past like Final Fantasy, Zelda, others. These games were great in design, imagination, and scale. But there were primarily in Japanese only development perspectives. Leading to odd characters designs of black people that sometimes just doesn't make any sense sometimes. 

    

Incus Interactive Productions LLC is made up by founders William Smith Jr.(Myself/Technical Artist) and David Smith (Brother/Concept Artist). Others have helped with development of this game as well. The story goes like this; Servantu Fatum is famous Bioenginer of a place called Lux Spatium, a Sci-fi fantasy city that Servantu builds biolife androids to protect. The problems comes in with his own creation.

And her name is Quo, Servantu most powerful creation that controls time and space! Quo is the Antagonist of Fated by Chain in rebellion over Servantu. The balance of power between Lux and the wild of biolifes is going to clash as Servantu learns of chains that he's made and how to balance them as he gains the the power of nature it self.   

 

Servantu will meet others on his mission to stop Quo and save Lux like Erlideau Thack below. Where aiming for a tight battle system for the Wii U's unique Gamepad controller.

Finally, Fated by Chain will be released in Europe first, and then the U.S. in two months there after on Nintento's eShop for Wii U. For more information on Incus and Fated by Chain check out this podcast and links below.

P.S. This will be a Nintendo eshop exclusive only!

http://www.incusinteractiveproductions.co/

https://www.facebook.com/incusinteractiveproductions

https://twitter.com/iip_incus

Read more…

Freaky Physics Experiment May Prove Our Universe Is A Two-Dimensional Hologram

Everyone knows the universe exists in three dimensions, right? Maybe not. For some time now serious physicists have been pondering the seemingly absurd possibility that three-dimensional space is merely an illusion--and that we actually live in a two-dimensional "hologram."

And now scientists at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois have launched a mind-blowing experiment to show once and for all what sort of universe we live in.

"We want to find out whether space-time is a quantum system just like matter is," Dr. Craig Hogan, director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics, said in a written statement. "If we see something, it will completely change ideas about space we've used for thousands of years."

According to quantum theory's uncertainty principle, it's impossible to know both the precise location and the exact velocity of a subatomic particle. If the same uncertainty principle applies to space as well as to matter, space too should have built-in fluctuations--a.k.a. "quantum jitter" or "holographic noise," according to the statement.

The 21 scientists involved in the experiment will look for the jitter with the help of an exquisitely sensitive device known as a Holometer. It produces laser beams 200,000 times brighter than a laser pointer and, with the help of an optical technique known as interferometry, measures jitter in the beams as small as a few billionths of a billionth of a meter.

"If we find a noise we can't get rid of, we might be detecting something fundamental about nature--a noise that is intrinsic to space-time," Dr. Aaron Chou, the experiment's lead scientist and project manager for the Holometer, said in the statement. "It's an exciting moment for physics. A positive result will open a whole new avenue of questioning about how space works."

The prospect of making a discovery that would not only defy common sense but also overturn centuries of scientific thinking has Chou thinking in philosophical, almost mystical terms.

"I have always believed that if indeed there is a creator, then the mechanism by which the world was created is not necessarily unknowable, and if we delve deeply enough we might reach some very interesting and inescapable conclusions," Chou told The Huffington Post in an email. "This topic brings up all sorts of interesting philosophical and theological questions which are perhaps better discussed over a beer or a nice cup of tea. In the meantime, we scientists have a job to do."

Read more…

Once Again...



I'll be in the state of Texas eating good barbecue and visiting with family and friends. Though it is where this blog was "born" and I will have access to the Internet and email, in the words of my character namesake, it is quite logical for me to take a respite from work-related and recreational usage of URLs, and actually read books made of papyrus near a pool.



Please enjoy all the previous posts. I will see you back online 8 September.


...................."\\//_"....................



"Dif tor heh smusma."
Read more…

The short answer of why I decided to make the female heroine of my fantasy/romance novel The Last King really dark and really feminine is because such a woman is a rarity to see in literature, film or television.

I mean, even if a heroine is black, she’s likely brown-colored or light, and she is most certainly going to have straight hair and not her natural curls.

Not so with Emmy Hughes – I decided to make her everything this world insists should not be considered beautiful, lovely and worth persuing – dark-skinned with kinky hair  (okay, it’s BIG kinky hair for sure, no teeny weeny afro’s I admit, but that’s because I like BIG hair).

The main reason I did this is because I’m tired of seeing the same images played out in the media of what’s attractive. I specifically wanted to contribute, no matter how small, to the idea of black women being seen as attractive and feminine.

Why feminine? Because black women have traditionally been denied the right to be seen this way, and personally, I think this has hurt us in numerous ways.

Yes, Virginia, feminine women do benefit in a society.

Yes, Virginia, feminine women do benefit in a society.

You see, feminine women tend to benefit from the resources of masculine men. Heck,they benefit  from society in general, and the fact is, black women have never really benefited from society or from men  - be it black men or white men (I speak of benefits in a healthy way – I’m not talking about gold-digging here; because benefiting isn’t just about economics – there are also physical, emotional, spiritual and social benefits).

What do I mean by black women haven’t benefited from men because we aren’t viewed as feminine? Well, bear with me on this train of thought.

Take a moment and think of how you, dear reader, view black women. Go on and be very honest with yourself. It’s only you and I ‘in the room’ at the moment. Now, think of most of the images you have either seen of black women, or associate with black women: from books and films, to television and music videos, black women have more often than not been portrayed in the following ways— as mammies, Jezebels, gold-diggers, and sapphires. On the news you will see hyped-up images of welfare queens or single moms, or loud uncouth individuals (the Claire Huxtables and Michelle Obama’s are rarely given their due) and in modern society black women have even become viewed as independent or STRONG black women.

Yet the one thing you rarely see us viewed as is FEMININE and desirable – at least, not desirable in respectable way.

We have not been considered the soft types who are worthy of pursuit; or who – as Sojourner Truth once mentioned in her famous speech “Ain’t I A Woman?” – are worthy of being helped into carriages (“That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages,” Sojourner said, “and lifted over ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or over mud puddles, or gives me any best place, and ain’t I a woman?”).

I think this view of us, this view that we have now internalized, has actually done great damage to our psyche.

Because of slavery, and the white mentality that instigated that slavery, we have been seen as chattel and sub-human. And “chattel” does not reap the resources of men or society, because it is assumed that chattel has no needs.

Indeed, chattel, mammies, jezebels and STRONG women are seen as neither needing a helping hand nor as deserving of one.

Now, recall again how you tend to view black women; better yet, recall the images you often see of us. From Mammy inGone with the Wind to Aibileen in The Help, and from Celie in the Color Purple to Precious and her mother in Precious (all of which are Oscar nominated films by the way; don’t you just love the roles Hollywood likes to see us nominated in?), we have by and large been viewed in a variety of negative, or unattractive roles, but never feminine ( (I’m not saying all images of black women are like this; but a good majority are – you get the point).

Yes, let’s take a look at these images, in case you have forgotten them.

THE HELP….(Oscar nominated film)

THE HELP: We'll handle the work: we can take it. We’ll handle the work: we can take it.

PRECIOUS…(Oscar nominated film).

PRECIOUS: No need to pursue us - there's nothing feminine here!

No need to pursue us: nothing feminine here!

 

 

GONE WITH THE WIND…. (Oscar nominated film).

GONE WITH THE WIND: "Whatever I can do fer Scarlette makes me happy! I got no needs of my own."

Whatever I can do fer Scarlett makes me happy! I got no needs of my own.

 

 

Now, consider their white or lighter skinned counterparts in each of these films.

THE HELP…

THE HELP: Even though I'm mean, I'm all dolled-up

Even though I’m mean, I’m all dolled-up

 

 

PRECIOUS…

PRECIOUS: You poor, fat, black thing with all of your pathology! Thank God I'm not you.

You poor, fat, black thing! Thank God I’m not you.

 

 

GONE WITH THE WIND….

GONE WITH THE WIND: My goodness! Don't I, Scarlett, look delicate. Even when I'm distressed!

My goodness! Don’t I, Scarlette, look delicate. Even when I’m distressed!

 

 

Continue looking at some of these images below. Which of these two groups of women, white or black, seem either unattractive, unfeminine and/or able to carry heavy loads? Be honest with yourselves now. (Ugh! The black women in these images, in these movies, don’t even get to wear make-up. Please. Women have loved prettying themselves up since the dawn of time – and that includes black women!)

But you wouldn’t know that black women want to be pretty too, at least, not from these pictures below.

 PINKY…                                                                                                                                                                           

Hair done. Check. Make-up on. Check. Too bad for the mammy figure though...

Hair done. Check. Make-up on. Check. Too bad for the mammy figure though…

 THE HELP….   

You carry the load, and I'll stand here in pink and look good.

You carry the load, and I’ll stand here in pink and look good.

 

 

imgres

An unrealistic image of a woman first thing in the morning. Gone with the Wind.

Meanwhile, white women have often been portrayed as dolled-up and feminine in situations where they shouldn’t be all dolled-up (like those old movies where the women wake-up first thing in the morning with all their make-up already on, i.e. the legendary Gone with the Wind. Meanwhile, the women in The Help can’t even get a little lipstick going on).

Now consider the show Orange is the New Black. I notice on huge billboards in New York that although everyone is in prison, the white female lead still gets to look like she just came out of  a hair and make-up salon!

Even in jail, I'm gonna be seen as gorgeous.

Even in jail, Hollywood is gonna make me gorgeous.

 

 

Meanwhile, crazy-eyes looks like something I have seen in old posters of black people that meant to degrade us.

Crazy-Eyes today.

Crazy-Eyes today.

"Crazy eyes" from yester-year. Crazy-Eyes is not a modern view of black women, but an old repeated one. new.

“Crazy eyes” from yester-year. Crazy-Eyes, you seei, is not a modern view of black women, but an old repeated one.

 

 

 

Continue to look below:

Now, is it me, or does the blonde woman in OITNB look good, dare I say even feminine, in all of these pictures? Can’t say the same for the black woman – she looks JACKED-UP and freaky. Even the lady with the knife gets to wear lipstick!

images

 

Man,you look great! I look, well, crazy.

Man,you look great! I look, well, crazy.

 

 

I even think the above picture ↑ reminds me of, well, this picture below ↓. Which characters look wild-eyed and a little insane and which ones look nice or sweet or calm and normal? You be the judge.

Look familiar?

Look familiar?

 

 

Continue looking. Who gets to be feminine the majority of the time in film and television?

Count the feminine looking ones, and the ones who look jacked-up

Count the feminine looking ones, and the ones who look jacked-up

 

 

No, seriously, I’m smelling some of the same-old same-old in depictions of us. Look below when the old “coons”of yesteryear ate watermelon. Thank goodness black women today only get to be degraded by eating pie and shoving it on their faces.

Last time we saw you, you were eating watermelon. Now, Crazy-eyes, you're eating pie.

Last time we saw you, you were eating watermelon. Now, Crazy-eyes, you’re eating pie. 

New era, same unfeminine, even coonish imagery.

New era, same non-feminine, even coonish imagery.

 

  

Actually, I just want to take a break here and show some old photos of my grandmother and mother (ok, grandpa is in here, too). These were very feminine women that I grew up with. Yet I rarely saw or even see their likeness portrayed in books and movies in a healthy way – again, I’m not talking about rare exceptions. I’m saying I didn’t and do not see these images of black women the majority of the time.

My grandparents in 1944. No cooning here. And man did they have style.

My grandparents in1944. No cooning here. And man! Did they have style.

Gasp! Black women even liked dressing up their little daughters. My mama and my aunt.

Gasp! Black women even liked dressing up their little daughters. My mama and my aunt.

My feminine mama: yep, she liked make-up. And her eyes weren't bucked-out while throwing pie on her face.

My feminine mama: yep, she liked make-up. And her eyes weren’t bucked-out while throwing pie on her face.

 

Where are these black women in movies, books and films?

Where are these black women in movies, books and films?

Who gets to be pretty and pursued?

Who gets to be pretty and pursued?

Now where was I?

Ah, yes.

These are some of the reasons  I purposely made my Emmy Hughes from The Last King very soft and feminine. It’s also why I put her in situations where she needed the help and resources of men – of her beloved father, and of her soon-to be love interest, Gilead Knightly. Both men are present in her life for a reason. (I also wanted to give her a life that was not filled with pathology – violence, incest, drugs, ghetto behavior, etc.).

And I did not make her a STRONG character; at least, not unnecessarily so. She’s smart for sure, and not anyone’s punching bag, but she does need assistance.

After all, why must black women be so STRONG that we take on burdens that are physically, mentally and emotionally crushing us? Has our strength stopped our obesity and health epidemic? Has our STRENGTH stemmed the flow of unwed motherhood (a problem that is wreaking havoc both in our communities and for future generations). Has our STRENGTH helped our numbers in marriage rise?

No.

And that’s a big NO.

Now, as a black woman myself, I am NOT here to put down other black women.  I am here hoping to help change how we view ourselves, first and foremost.

Black beauty - soft and feminine

Black beauty – soft and feminine

Personally, I think being soft and feminine and in need of help is great place for us to start. Other women need help. What’s wrong with us admitting we need it, too? Being strong in the sense of taking on everything, and helping everyone, while needing no help and love for ourselves is stupid. And it’s part of an image that was assigned to us in slavery. Therefore, it can’t be good.

Now I ask you, when is the last time you saw in a movie or film, a dark-skinned woman, pretty, made-up, hair done, being pursued as a romantic interest? When do you get to see us being soft and feminine and wanted? Think hard now. Because even if you do come up with one such movie, it will likely be, well, one movie (unless it’s an independent film;  I admit I am not up to date on my independent movies.)

And when is the last time you heard someone say, “Wow, she’s a strong white woman. Look at that strong Japanese woman! You go girl!”

Nobody says that.

Now don’t get me wrong. Strength in a woman does have a place: after all, there is work to do in this world. There are families to care for and dreams to achieve. It takes strength to accomplish any of those tasks.  But strength in a woman as her main character trait does not bode well. You see, it cannot be the defining characteristic when one thinks of  a woman.

And if you do believe strength should be a woman’s defining characteristic, consider where it has gotten us. The black community is now a matriarchal community that has a 70 percent out of wedlock rate. This not strength. This is brokenness.

But, listen. I know that calling a woman strong first and foremost, sounds like a compliment. I get it. You mean well by it. But underneath that “compliment” lies the (sometimes) unintentional belief that since a black woman is strong she can handle suffering more. She’s all good, and is able to endure all kinds of trauma and strife, with no need to pour her heart out from the deep pain she truly feels.

Baloney.

All of this so-called strength is actually sapping us of our joy. In not being viewed as feminine we have lost an ability to be vulnerable and lean on others – particularly on men.

Yes, I said it. I said the word Men. They are NOT a necessary evil. Their strength is needed. And men, the masculine ones at least, tend to like feminine and vulnerable women as romantic interests (I’m not talking about stupid, blind vulnerability either; you know, the kind that allows a women to be a punching bag -um, no thanks!).

Delicate and vulnerable

Delicate and vulnerable

You see, to be a STRONG black woman as opposed to a feminine black woman indicates no need for us to be vulnerable or open. But a woman, almost by definition, is more vulnerable in this world, simply because were are not physically stronger than men. That’s a fact.

Indeed, we have been led to believe such traits of vulnerability are weak (probably because vulnerability does lead to the possibility of being hurt; but being strong has done on a whipping on us, too). But in fact, we are hurting more because we aren’t open to admitting we need the help of others, of men in particular, in our lives. And yet, we have love to give and we have love that we need.

We need the resources of men, because men, when they use their strength in the right way, are wonderful!

This is where viewing ourselves as feminine comes in. Because, you see, feminine women are thought of as worthy of being the sorts of women that men want to rescue and offer a helping hand to.

Who wants to be viewed as The Help all the time? Ugh!

Who wants to be viewed as The Help all the time? Ugh!

And this foolish thinking we have about ourselves won’t change until we stop seeing ourselves as The Strong Help – Able To Do It All, No-Make-Up or Soft Qualities Needed.

We are NOT the help and we are not masculine women. We are soft, feminine women who can get the job done when it’s needed, sure, but we want to be pursued and rescued, too.

So I think we need to cease singing that Aretha Franklin song  “Sisters Are Doing It For Themselves” or the Destiny’s Child tune “Independent Woman.”

We have been doing it for ourselves all along. We have been strong, and we have been independent.

And frankly, it’s killing us.

 

BIOGRAPHY of A. Yamina Collins 

 

The Last King is Yamina’s first novel, and it has already been in Amazon’s Top 100 Bestseller’s list in Fantasy, Science-fiction, Women’s Fiction Literature and Christian Women’s Literature.

 

graduate of New York University, she lives in Manhattan and currently blogs at Yaminatoday.com. Her dream as an author is to help create new images of major African-American characters in literature.

 

She hates stereotypes. No, really. She does.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read more…

Keeling Curve...

Source: Greg Laden's Science Blog

As told by the American Museum of Natural History (went there two weeks ago for my birthday):

Related sites:

Climate Central: Keeling Curve
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

NOAA: Earth System Research Laboratory
Scripps CO2 Program: Home of the Keeling Curve
Scripps Institution of Oceanography: The Keeling Curve

Read more…

The Resurrection of the Negromancer.

Well damn. I done fount this old thing. See, I had forgot that I subscribed to this site. Forgot the email attached to this account, even! But, the wells of memory are deep and something stirred within those depths and brought me back.

That something was my brand new podcast.

It is called BrownCoats, Black Magic. It covers Nerd Culture and People of Color and the interesting interactions between them. I am the black magic portion and my cohost is of Indian extraction and brings the Brown.  If you would be so kind as to check out our blog and the attendant podcast in your spare moments, I'd love ya for it.

This week in particular could be of interest as we delve into the written word with focus on Comic Books and Urban Fantasy Novels. The New Ms. Marvel, Jeremy Love's Bayou, The Jungle Book and Ben Aaronovitch's Peter Grant Novels all get the once over!

BrownCoats, Black Magic

The Facebook Page!

The Twitter!

The SoundCloud where you can hear my melodious voice!

Thanks in advance brethren and sistren! It's been a while, but its good to be black, er... back.

Read more…

Quantum Physics and Breathing...

Image source: Renewing All Things

(Inside Science) – Why don't we suffocate whenever we try to take a breath? An international team of scientists has used quantum mechanics – the science that usually deals with events at the level of the ultra-small – to solve this human-sized mystery.



Quantum mechanics has long proved its value in understanding such phenomena as the behavior of electrons and in classifying subatomic particles. But in recent years theorists have increasingly shown how it applies to all facets of life, large and small.



The new research, led by Cédric Weber of Kings College, London and reported in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, confirms that point.



"This work," said team member David O'Regan, a physicist at Ireland's Trinity College, Dublin, "helps to illustrate the fact that quantum-mechanical effects, which may sometimes be viewed as somehow very exotic or only relevant under extreme conditions, are at play in the day-to-day regimes where biology, chemistry, and materials science operate."



The paper's titled: "Renormalization of myoglobin–ligand binding energetics by quantum many-body effects." That's a mouthful, I know but you're a sharp crowd knowing you've read this far.



Side note: this is the National Academy of Sciences, started March 3, 1863 by President Abraham Lincoln.



They use a technique - Density Functional Theory, or DFT, which won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1998, and its extension Density Mean-Field Theory. Some excerpts:



"DFT has been the standard tool for simulating electronic properties of materials and molecules for a number of years," O'Regan said.



The team used the technique to study reactions between the iron atom inside myoglobin and a molecule of oxygen or carbon monoxide. These reactions involve electrostatics, the arrangement of electric charges in atoms and molecules. When the iron atom transfers negative electric charges to an oxygen or carbon monoxide molecule, it enables the molecule to attach itself to the entire myoglobin protein.



Unfortunately, the theory consistently predicted that carbon monoxide should bind to myoglobin much more readily than oxygen.



"Using DMFT, we showed that, in fact, close to one electron is transferred to the oxygen molecule," Cole explained. "This provides much greater electrostatic stabilization than previously thought. It means that our estimate of the relative binding of oxygen and carbon dioxide is now in excellent agreement with experiment."



The analysis revealed that an effect called entanglement plays a critical role in binding oxygen molecules to the protein. Entanglement is a quintessential characteristic of quantum mechanics that links pairs of electrons so strongly that they no longer act independently. The process also involves Hund's exchange, another quantum-mechanical property that previous simulations had ignored.



The research has potential uses beyond understanding the molecular basis of breathing. According to Cole, the better understanding of how molecules bind to iron-containing proteins could help the drug-development process and possibly facilitate the design of artificial photosynthesis devices that would capture and store energy from the sun.



Impact: Supplying oxygen to the International Space Station would be a good low-orbital beta test platform. We could terraform our own planet, that we seem determined to do with the burning of fossil fuels anyway - our photosynthesis devices could remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and supply us with oxygen as its byproduct - we kind of need that. If we could do that, settling the Moon, Mars or any other planet would be a lot simpler once we engineer faster propulsion systems than we have currently. On Earth, "Green Tech" could literally mean converting solar energy into chemical energy useful to us as farmed (as in food) or mined resources. These are inevitably a dwindling supply and the basis for our current inequality hierarchy and scarcity economics. Please read the rest of the article at the link for more information.



Inside Science: How Quantum Mechanics Helps Us Breathe, Peter Gwynne

Read more…

we ain't did tribes yet

As a people we done everything to be except tribes.

The closest we come to is street gangs. We've called ourselves Africans, African-Americans, Blacks, and if we find one more way to divide us we will be nuts. So, here's the rap: If we were really Africans we should know something about tribes. Also since when we ran away from the plantation into the woods we met the Indians who had tribes. And if also some of us were indigenous (same time as the Indians but not Indians but like Indians) we should know something about tribes.

Now let me tell you about tribes in my brief experience, being a Black person. When I was a kid we lived on the same street as my grandparents, uncles, aunts and cousins all on my dad's side plus we had regular close contact with mom's family in another city. When a big problem hit we talked about it, dealt with it as a big family. After we grew up that all went away, it's every family for themselves. Weddings, funerals and family reunions are the only times we see each other or talk.

Forget about having the illusive Indian or African blood, we need to consider Tribes where we are, here, and save our families. We could empower each other better. Oh yeah and until the main stream media supports positive Black life, we should limit our intake. As enlarged families I'm sure better programming can be had.

Hey, speculative fiction turns into reality. With simple science, metaphysics we can go natural without being or looking primitive. There is room to experiment and create because our new paradigm is not a society that doesn't need us anymore. And we get to exercise all that wisdom we've been reading for the last 50 years.

Think of it this way, we built it all for them, lets be about building our own. The funny part is what will they do without us paying attention to them and entertaining them. We really don't have time for that. We do have time for tribes. Tribes are real blood families first, not political/social/religious groups. Family first.

Read more…


 JT Buckley and I follow each other on Twitter (@AuthorJTBuckley). I have the honor of working with him on two book covers. This is one of them ...


The plague of murders across every major city in the world has drawn Vampire Hunter, Rick Smythe, back to LA in search of his parentsmurderer. The orphaned Rick grew up in the streets, learning skills that he would need to track and destroy his nemesis. In LA he meets Saria, a social worker with a dark, dangerous secret. Nickolea, Saria’s vicious ex-lover, plans Rick’s demise to incapacitate her. When Rick is mortally wounded, Saria’s secret is revealed. To survive, they must hunt down the people they hate the most and bring them to justice. They soon find themselves on the edge of a war that could destroy the world as they know it.

~

As with all of my authors, JT presented me with a fun challenge ... Create a bleeding, steel rose, lit by a single spotlight. Sounds fairly simple, right?

:|
 


The real trick was making red blood show up on a black floor, in a black room, with only one light source. It took a bit of fiddlin', but this is the result.

Onto wrapping up the next book :D


Until next time ...


This post edited by Grammarly*: Three errors were remedied.


*Blurbs and quotes provided are not edited by WillowRaven, but posted as provided by author/publisher. 


Read more…

Holodeck Invented by black man?

Hello all,

I am currently working on a program for a 3d augmented/virtual telecommunication ui/ux for consumers and certain medical, government, entertainment and education markets. I believe that my invention could change humanity. To give you an idea of my patent idea read these pages https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10101319050523971 https://www.spaceglasses.com/applicants/499 then compare the dates and if you're an intelligent person, which I'm sure you are, you can put two and two together, and if your a betting person which we will find out, you'll vote for my application and help me bring my invention to fruitation before Zuckerberg takes credit for stealing it.  As recently as last summer the guy who originally invented, then sold the "Canopy" technology to Motorola in early 2000, who I will refer to simply as "Bill" was to start a fully funded LLC with me, but subsequently ended up disappearing with some of the IP I disclosed with him thus far the day before we were to incorporate and draft patent applications, I've since refined and altered my IP and drafted a nondisclosure agreement for all future in depth discussions of my potential invention, so i know especially after Zuckerbergs purchase of Oculus, that this is a new novel and nonobvious invention.  I am currently drafting a non provisional patent to acquire patent pending status for a commercial product.  I've done countless hours of patent searches and research on my method to implement my invention, and I've found, it is possible and it doesn't exist yet, the closest I've found is this guy http://youtu.be/U4eytLU6sws a Stanford professor still working in the research lab, compare the date again, also he has no mention of augmented reality implementations like mine.  I'm on to something here people, and these guys are on my tail, with way deeper pockets, but way less creativity, so I have decided to let my voice be heard.  If anyone would like to help me on this I would love to correspond with you,  I am willing to discuss this further with any software engineers, software designers, 3d artists, computer vision persons, and industrial design persons who would like to help and don't mind signing a NDA.

Best regards, 
A. Baldwin

P.s. please spread the facts, FB and none of these guys save the Stanford professor conceived of the holodeck using today's consumer components before I did.  They still don't have an OS for all this VR/AR tech, they all are using videogames concepts to make video games with it.  I was 1st to see the impact this tech could make out side of video games check my disclosure date for my app.  None proceeds this idea.  FB came along with the idea 6 months later, and even then everyone thought Mark was crazy until he revealed "MY" idea for his course of action.  Trust me when I say and do the footwork, I did, none proceeded me, a black man invented the 1st generation natural, intuitive, immersive holodeck..... with your help of course, so please vote today.

Read more…

The EmDrive That Wasn't...

The EmDrive produces propulsion without propellant, according to its inventor. (Credit: SPR, Ltd)

Physicist John Baez has another, more colorful word to describe the spate of recent reports about a breakthrough space engine that produces thrust without any propellant. The word starts with “bull–.” I won’t finish it, this being a family-friendly web site and all. Baez himself has softened his tone and now calls it “baloney,” though his sentiment remains the same: The laws of physics remain intact, and the “impossible” space drive is, as far as anyone can tell, actually impossible.



The story begins several years back with a British inventor named Roger Shawyer and his EmDrive, a prototype rocket engine which he claimed generated thrust by bouncing microwaves around in an enclosed metal funnel. Since no mass or energy emerged from the engine, Shawyer’s claim was another way of saying that he’d found a way to violate the conservation of momentum. In Baez’s words, “this is about as plausible as powering a spaceship by having the crew push on it from the inside.” Shawyer argued that he was exploiting a loophole within general relativity. Baez calls his explanation “mumbo jumbo.”



I'd read about the EmDrive, and didn't blog about it, thankfully. Something about it didn't "smell right," and it put me in the mind of the whole "cold fusion" boondoggle of the late 80's - early 90's. Plus, I ran into some links that gave a "404" error, which if you're trying to convince someone to fund your project is probably not a good sell! Surprisingly, a few courageous ones are still doing work in the area. As my Air Force JROTC instructor was apt to say to disavow responsibility or knowledge in any subject: "not the kid!"



This is not to be confused with warp drive. That science is actually being done painstakingly, and the reporting as accurate as possible. Meaning: as science goes, one must report the failures as well as the successes and subject your study to ruthless peer review. It's the science equivalent of a gauntlet at a bar fight. Even 1/10th the speed of light would be a significant accomplishment, and get us to at least Alpha Centauri in a human lifetime. It would at least reduce Mars to a matter of minutes (I'll leave space tourism to the visionary).



The author, Corey S. Powell, ends his article with an appropriate Latin metaphor. The rest of the article is at the link below:



"Ad astra per aspera: through hardship, to the stars."



Discovery: Did NASA Validate an “Impossible” Space Drive? In a Word, No.
Cory S. Powell

Read more…

Aura - The Power of Legend

Meet Pozitron... the cosmic hero that was featured in my first anthology book
entitled Immortal Fantasy. Pozitron wages a secret war against his sworn
enemy... a race of demons known only as " The Aganza."

His first adventure can be found in Immortal Fantasy no. 1 and yes,
there will be a second volume of the same name, already in the works.

Sometimes he is referred to as the Afro - Techno Cosmic Warrior.

I am cool with that. He is definitely a character that is of epic proportions.

Think Space Opera... or Jack Kirby's New Gods... now you get
the idea. All of this and more coming...

October 21, in Aura- The art of Winston Blakely

Read more…

Spin Symmetry...

Illustration of symmetry in the magnetic properties—or nuclear spins—of strontium atoms. JILA researchers observed that if two atoms have the same nuclear spin state (top), they interact weakly, and the interaction strength does not depend on which of the 10 possible nuclear spin states are involved. If the atoms have different nuclear spin states (bottom), they interact much more strongly, and, again, always with the same strength.
Credit: Ye and Rey groups and Steve Burrows/JILA

Just as diamonds with perfect symmetry may be unusually brilliant jewels, the quantum world has a symmetrical splendor of high scientific value.



Confirming this exotic quantum physics theory, JILA physicists led by theorist Ana Maria Rey and experimentalist Jun Ye have observed the first direct evidence of symmetry in the magnetic properties—or nuclear “spins”—of atoms. The advance could spin off practical benefits such as the ability to simulate and better understand exotic materials exhibiting phenomena such as superconductivity (electrical flow without resistance) and colossal magneto-resistance (drastic change in electrical flow in the presence of a magnetic field).



The JILA discovery, described in Science Express,* was made possible by the ultra-stable laser used to measure properties of the world’s most precise and stable atomic clock.** JILA is jointly operated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Colorado Boulder.

“Spin symmetry has a very strong impact on materials science, as it can give rise to unexpected behaviors in quantum matter,” JILA/NIST Fellow Jun Ye says. “Because our clock is this good—really it’s the laser that’s this good—we can probe this interaction and its underlying symmetry, which is at a very small energy scale.”


Read more…

If You Meet The Buddha...

Source: Ha Ha! Funny! LOL!

Question:
I have heard the phrase “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him!” many times. Can you explain this?

Answer:

It actually comes from an old koan attributed to Zen Master Linji, (the founder of the Rinzai sect). It’s a simple one:

“If you meet the Buddha, kill him.”– Linji

I’m sure you already realize that it’s not being literal. The road, the killing, and even the Buddha are symbolic.

The road is generally taken to mean the path to Enlightenment; that might be through meditation, study, prayer, or just some aspect of your way of life. Your life is your road. That’s fairly straightforward as far as metaphors go.

But how do you meet the Buddha on this “road?” Imagine meeting some symbolic Buddha. Would he be a great teacher that you might actually meet and follow in the real world? Could that Buddha be you yourself, having reached Enlightenment? Or maybe you have some idealized image of perfection that equates to your concept of the Buddha or Enlightenment.

Whatever your conception is of the Buddha, it’s WRONG! Now kill that image and keep practicing. This all has to do with the idea that reality is an impermanent illusion. If you believe that you have a correct image of what it means to be Enlightened, then you need to throw out (kill) that image and keep meditating.

Most people have heard the first chapter of the Tao, “The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.” (So if you think you see the real Tao, kill it and move on).

Source: Bryan Schell

Science: "the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment" (Oxford); also defined succinctly with subject examples here.



For the record: I am not a Buddhist. My fascination in this quote stems from the old "Kung Fu" series with David Carradine, (who was great, but I think in all fairness should have been the show's concept originator - Bruce Lee, oh well). It's also how this "Buddha murder" coincides with the scientific enterprise, and may explain the stress felt by this contradiction in other human endeavors.

This statement, however captures the "messiness" and disturbing protocol of science: what was a scientific accepted norm, theory or "truth" can with further (and, hopefully better-controlled) experimentation can be thrown away, discarded like previous theories regarding the speed of light (the Michelson-Morley Experiment). Science in the 19th Century looked at the universe as a mechanical, physical balance. Thus, Michelson and Morley tried to measure this balance, the stationary luminiferous aether: waves were transmitted in water; sound in air; light must be in the "aether wind." They "failed" to find it, but found something else; they "killed the [previous] Buddha."

From the site of Sci-Fi writer Peter Watts, he writes:

Science follows the creed of disproof, after all. The whole edifice is founded on the admission that everything we know might be wrong, that any of today’s "facts" might tomorrow be tested and found wanting. Science is pretty straightforward as a concept; in practice it’s messy as hell, full of arguments and counterarguments, noise and statistical filters. It’s a perfect target to those who crave certitude and simplicity: every dispute over detail can be twisted into an indictment of the entire process,...

Part of the enterprise is to learn something today you didn't know yesterday. If it is written down, and you want to refer to it as "science," then you have to lend the subject to scrutiny, criticism, relentless peer review and if found in error: disproving. If you require "steadiness," science can be a little disturbing, especially if its discoveries "kills" sacred Buddhas.



Michelson-Morley set the foundation for Einstein: first the Special Theory of Relativity (speed of light), then the General Theory (gravity). Einstein reluctantly contributed to Quantum Mechanics, which leads to modern micro-to-nano electronics and the laptops, flat screens, I-pads et al we now all enjoy. This set the stage for François Englert and Peter Higgs. They have hopefully, set the stage for those who will inevitably follow, making still new discoveries in their intellectual wake.

I watched the following TED Talk from Naomi Oreskes a while back. I initially didn't quite know then where to place it for a blog that promotes science curiosity and literacy - not that I didn't agree with it, but I now see as an appropriate denouement. Sourced from Physics Database, ending this discourse (and I am off to, of course "killing Buddhas"):
Read more…

TARDIS...

Source: Fan Pop

For Time And Relative Dimensions In Space, of course! I was introduced to The Doctor in the 80's by fellow Air Force Lieutenant Beth Richards: she hooked me on it. (If you're reading this Beth, I'm still a big fan.) The eleventh Doctor appears tonight, I think it's the same actor as in the other BBC series I follow, The Musketeers. I need to visit England again. Haven't been since 2000.

Although, "freezing" the TARDIS chameleon circuit in the shape of a London phone box/booth in the age of I-phones is complete nostalgia...most kids probably wouldn't know it if it materialized in front of them, landing on their foot! It used to make sense, trust me.



Found this Dr. Who special on Daily Motion. Enjoy!

Doctor-Who-7x98-Special-The-Science-of-Doctor-Who by jose-hita-9

BBC America: Doctor Who
Twitter: #newtowho


Tomorrow: If You Meet The Buddha

Read more…

Midsize Rarity...

An image of the starburst galaxy, Messier 82 (M82). (Courtesy: NASA, ESA and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA))

Astronomers in the US have used the flickering of X-rays to pin down the mass of a black hole in the nearby galaxy M82, finding the black hole to be about 400 times as massive as the Sun. This means it is of the rarest, mid-sized black-hole type, and raises the question of how these odd objects arise.

Mass is a fundamental property of any black hole, which has so much gravity that nothing can escape its grip. Black holes come in two main types: stellar-mass black holes that are roughly 10 times as massive as the Sun, such as Cygnus X-1, and supermassive black holes, which are typically millions or billions of times as massive as the Sun and inhabit the centres of large galaxies.

But there is a big gap between the two types. Intermediate-mass black holes "are much, much less studied compared with stellar and supermassive black holes," says Dheeraj Pasham, an astronomer at the University of Maryland in College Park. That is because intermediate-mass black holes are rare, with only one firm example ever identified.

Physics World: Nearby galaxy harbors rarest type of black hole

Read more…

Deep #Ferguson History...

"Just miles away from the scene of the protests in Ferguson lies the grave of Dred Scott at the Calvary Cemetery on West Florissant Avenue. Born a slave in Virginia, Scott sued in a St. Louis court for his freedom. The case went to the Supreme Court, resulting in a landmark 1857 decision that African Americans were not citizens of the United States and therefore had no rights to sue in federal courts. The court described blacks as "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." The Dred Scott Decision is considered by many to be the worst decision in the Supreme Court’s history."

My take: "Citizen's United" might give it a run for it's money!
Democracy Now!:
Ferguson Protests Erupt Near Grave of Ex-Slave Dred Scott, Whose Case Helped Fuel U.S. Civil War
PBS: Dred Scott case: the Supreme Court decision

Read more…

Kilobot...

Science: How Stuff Works

Fish gotta school, birds gotta flock, and robots, it seems, gotta swarm. At least, that’s what they’re doing on the workbench of Harvard University computer scientists Michael Rubenstein and Radhika Nagpal and Massachusetts Institute of Technology computer scientist Alejandro Cornejo. Each of their 1024 robots, called Kilobots, is a three-legged disk the size of a U.S. quarter, sporting a single curl of metallic hair. En masse, they form a mechanical multitude an order of magnitude larger than any robot swarm ever built—a possible precursor to future robot work squads choreographed for chores such as cleaning up oil spills.

“That is a beautiful accomplishment,” says Hod Lipson, a roboticist at Cornell University who was not involved with the work. “Really getting a thousand robots to perform in sort of perfect synchrony.”



The idea for swarms of robots working together comes from nature. Army ants link themselves together to form rafts and bridges, and neurons in a brain fire off signals that collectively create intelligence. They do it all by following collective algorithms—shared sets of rules and instructions—and taking their cues from what’s going on around them. Each individual is “just doing its own thing, locally. But fantastic things emerge out of their collective behavior,” Lipson says.



Science: Heads up for the gathering robot swarm, Angus Chen

Read more…