Reginald L. Goodwin's Posts (3117)

Sort by

Diversity in STEM...

Mural, 24th. Street, Chicago. (Seth Anderson via Flickr)

What is diversity?



One challenge to conversations about diversity is a lack of precision in language. The word “diversity” is used in many contexts to mean many different things. Often, and unfortunately, diversity is used as the antonym of heterosexual, able-bodied, middle-class-to-wealthy white male. This is not what diversity is about. The New Oxford American Dictionary gives us this definition:



diversity |diˈvərsitē, dī-| noun: (a) the state of being diverse; variety: there was considerable diversity in the style of the reports. (b) a range of different things: newspapers were obliged to allow a diversity of views to be printed.



Why does diversity matters in science?



1. Diversity is critical to excellence.

2. Lack of diversity represents a loss of talent.

3. Enhancing diversity is key to long-term economic growth and global competitiveness.



Scientific American: Diversity in STEM, Kenneth (Kenny) Gibbs, Jr., PhD
Cancer Prevention Fellow, National Cancer Institute.

Read more…

Mes de la Herencia Hispana...

The irony: in a country of immigrants, we're becoming "tribal"; somehow E pluribus unum: out of many, one - has lost its original Latin origins and just become a slogan printed on our money - if we ever bother to look at it.

"Self-deportation" and repatriation as some have suggested would be a logistical and political nightmare that the global economy would immediately reject us as incompetent and unstable. Diversity has to be our strength, we have no other choice for continued existence as a nation state. If not, other countries that had neither a "remember the Alamo" nor Civil War will make us look like a byword, an anachronism...a joke on the pages of history.

That devolution does not have to take long...

During National Hispanic Heritage Month (September 15 to October 15) we recognize the contributions made and the important presence of Hispanic and Latino Americans to the United States and celebrate their heritage and culture.

PBS "bucket list"



Hispanics have had a profound and positive influence on our country through their strong commitment to family, faith, hard work, and service. They have enhanced and shaped our national character with centuries-old traditions that reflect the multiethnic and multicultural customs of their community. *
From 2013



* Site: National Hispanic Heritage Month 2014

Read more…

Peace Dividend...

US President George H.W. Bush (41) and UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

"Peace dividend" is a political slogan popularized by US President George H.W. Bush  (41) and UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the early 1990s, purporting to describe the economic benefit of a decrease in defense spending. It is used primarily in discussions relating to the guns versus butter theory. The term was frequently used at the end of the Cold War, when many Western nations significantly cut military spending. Wikipedia



Just how did that turn out?

Statistic: Per capita defense expenditure of the United States from 1990 to 2013 (in U.S. dollars) | Statista
Find more statistics at Statista


“By some latent intuition, Fleming was able to peer beyond the Cold War limitations of mere spy fiction and to anticipate the emerging milieu of the Colombian cartels, Osama Bin Laden and indeed the Russian Mafia.”

“It was Fleming who first conjured it and who reached beyond the KGB into our world of the Colombian cartel, the Russian mafia, and other “non-state actors” like al-Qaeda. “SPECTRE,” I noticed recently, is an anagram of “Respect,” the name of a small British party led by a power-drunk micro-megalomaniac called George Galloway, a man with a friendly connection to Saddam Hussein.” Christopher Hitchens

Living here in NY, I got to see the reaction of people who'd lost loved ones on 9-11 in 2011 file in the streets on the announced killing of Bin Laden. Many sang; many cried. For many young people, this was their "Pearl Harbor," the moment int their lives they'll always remember. I would like to think many waited for this political "peace dividend."

I don't know if we really want to know how to do that.

The National Ignition Facility (the "Warp core" on the Star Trek reboot) achieved a milestone last year: "the amount of energy released through the fusion reaction exceeded the amount of energy being absorbed by the fuel." There was no fanfare, no parades, no endless loop on the daily news talk shows. It was ignored with the exception of the Facility and the article I provide from the BBC: the BRITISH Broadcasting Company. Australia - "a country that gets more solar radiation per square foot than anywhere on the planet" - has gone back to coal. MIT Technology Review notes "clean tech's failure" with 2013's surge in Carbon Dioxide. I have to disagree with that. There is a thread here, a cynical, sinister thread. I think "peace dividend" scares the bejesus out of more than a few people invested in the status quo.

War is essentially a struggle over resources in what we now have: a global scarcity economy.

Wealth and power are concentrated in the hands of a few. It has been that way since the European Renaissance and Protestant Reformation. Those few know how to make their vast incomes in scarcity resources and are not interested in changing that paradigm. Those few in the US and other countries have taken over governments, hijacking democratic republics' political processes to maximize revenue. Armies are now supplied by design firms and defense contractors that only make profits when we have a "boogie man": Russians (Vlad the ex-KGB bare-chested, horseback-riding impaler is making a comeback); Russian Mafia, Colombian cartels - the "War on Drugs"; Saddam Hussein (deceased); Osama Bin Laden (deceased); now ISIL/ISIS emerges, formless, leaderless and in Toyota trucks. Congress is rediscovering its war powers responsibilities, even while publicly insisting they'd rather watch from the safe sidelines to either cheer or criticize if the president acts alone.

"Non-state actors"...and profit: Iraq 4.0: 41, 42, 43 and 44 - dip, lather, rinse and repeat.

Read more…

Home to Roost...




Newsflash: there are no major differences in the neoliberalism machinations of "no child's behind left" and "race to the bottom." Middle and high school teachers are tasked to "teach-to-the-test" (and told to lie they are not) if they want continued employment. With that coerced "foundation," it's no wonder today's college graduates are not developing the critical thinking skills and problem-solving acumen necessary for global competitiveness. We are all hostage to the testing-industrial-complex (TIC) that thinks once we've cajoled children in Pavlovian fashion to regurgitate answers, we'll still be the "shining city on a hill" of our own self-deluded mythology and design the next great invention. The faux controversies between evolution, the age of the universe and "intelligent design" only throws gasoline on a glowing funeral pyre that was once our country, and confuses the hell out of a lot of young people. Evidence shows others have moved on and advanced beyond our demented imaginations and fantasies.

Are science and religion doomed to eternal "warfare," or can they just get along? Philosophers, theologians, scientists, and atheists debate this subject endlessly (and often, angrily). We hear a lot less from economists on the matter, however. But in a recent paper, Princeton economist Roland Bénabou and two colleagues unveiled a surprising finding that would at least appear to bolster the "conflict" camp: Both across countries and also across US states, higher levels of religiosity are related to lower levels of scientific innovation.




"Places with higher levels of religiosity have lower rates of scientific and technical innovation, as measured by patents per capita," comments Bénabou. He adds that the pattern persists "when controlling for differences in income per capita, population, and rates of higher education."



That's the most salient finding from the paper by Bénabou and his colleagues, which uses an economic model to explore how scientific innovation, religiosity, and the power of the state interact to form different "regimes." The three kinds of regimes that they identify: a secular, European-style regime in which religion has very little policy influence and science garners great support; a repressive, theocratic regime in which the state and religion merge to suppress science; and a more intermediate, American-style regime in which religion and science both thrive, with the state supporting science and religions (mostly) trying to accommodate themselves to its findings.

Mother Jones: Study: Science and Religion Really Are Enemies After All,
Chris Mooney

Related book links:

Susan Jacoby (see video embed) - The Age of American Unreason:



"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." Thomas Jefferson, 1816

The three Great Premises of Idiot America, Charles P. Pierce:

· Any theory is valid if it sells books, soaks up ratings, or otherwise moves units
· Anything can be true if someone says it loudly enough
· Fact is that which enough people believe. Truth is determined by how fervently they believe it

Eric Fromm - Escape From Freedom:


If humanity cannot live with the dangers and responsibilities inherent in freedom, it will probably turn to authoritarianism. This is the central idea of Escape from Freedom, a landmark work by one of the most distinguished thinkers of our time, and a book that is as timely now as when first published in 1941. Few books have thrown such light upon the forces that shape modern society or penetrated so deeply into the causes of authoritarian systems. If the rise of democracy set some people free, at the same time it gave birth to a society in which the individual feels alienated and dehumanized. Using the insights of psychoanalysis as probing agents, Fromm’s work analyzes the illness of contemporary civilization as witnessed by its willingness to submit to totalitarian rule.

Tomorrow: Peace Dividend

Read more…

VAMA...

Blog: Her Blueprint


Today is the 20th anniversary of the Violence Against Women Act in America.

A total of 27 NFL players were arrested in the off season prior to this current fiasco + 2 more (see Aaron Hernandez of the New England Patriots at the first link) + Adrian Peterson"Video-gate" treated more as a public relations faux pas than anything otherwise. The two-game suspension was a slap on the wrist compared to the league's punitive standards on the evil marijuana weed - an entire season. The previous hand-wringing discussions were on some current and former players committing suicide. Despite the brief shallow introspection of public naval-gazing, we eventually get on with the billion-dollar industry's contemporary gladiator spectacle with a modern Roman shrug.

And make no mistake on the business focus: the NFL made $9 billion dollars last season, and Roger Goodell had a stated public goal of $25 billion by 2027. So, resolving quickly this latest in a string of incidents was simply and cynically in protection of that goal.

The savagery of war and collision sports wreck the same havoc resulting in traumatic brain injury. To be successful at both, a level of aggression must be cultivated, fostered and unleashed at practice, on the field of battle and in the locker room. It is hardly surprising that like war, it is difficult to turn off the testosterone at home, or in elevators.

The World Conference on Human Rights, held in Vienna, Austria, in 1993, and the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in the same year, concluded that civil society and governments have acknowledged that domestic violence is a public health policy and human rights concern.




The Violence Against Women Act was developed and passed as a result of extensive grassroots efforts in the late 1980s and early 1990s, with advocates and professionals from the battered women's movement, sexual assault advocates, victim services field, law enforcement agencies, prosecutors' offices, the courts, and the private bar urging Congress to adopt significant legislation to address domestic and sexual violence. Since its original passage in 1994, VAWA's focus has expanded from domestic violence and sexual assault to also include dating violence and stalking. It funds services to protect adult and teen victims of these crimes, and supports training on these issues, to ensure consistent responses across the country. One of the greatest successes of VAWA is its emphasis on a coordinated community response to domestic violence, sex dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; courts, law enforcement, prosecutors, victim services, and the private bar currently work together in a coordinated effort that had not heretofore existed on the state and local levels. VAWA also supports the work of community-based organizations that are engaged in work to end domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; particularly those groups that provide culturally and linguistically specific services. Additionally, VAWA provides specific support for work with tribes and tribal organizations to end domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking against Native American women.



Source: Wikipedia



White House Fact Sheet: Violence Against Women Act

Tomorrow: Home to Roost

Read more…

Nanoparticle Detector...

IMAGE BY J. ZHU, B. PENG, S.K. OZDEMIR, L. YANG *

Nanoparticles, engineered materials about a billionth of a meter in size, are around us every day. Although they are tiny, they can benefit human health, as in some innovative early cancer treatments, but they can also interfere with it through viruses, air pollution, traffic emissions, cosmetics, sunscreen and electronics.



A team of researchers at Washington University in St. Louis, led by Lan Yang, PhD, the Das Family Career Development Associate Professor in Electrical & Systems Engineering, and their collaborators at Tsinghua University in China have developed a new sensor that can detect and count nanoparticles, at sizes as small as 10 nanometers, one at a time. The researchers say the sensor could potentially detect much smaller particles, viruses and small molecules.



The research appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences online Early Edition Sept. 1, 2014.



* Arrays of self-referenced and self-heterodyned Whispering-Gallery Raman microlasers for single nanoparticle detection. A “pump” laser generates a single Raman lasing mode inside the silica resonators. Upon landing of a nanoparticle on the resonator, Raman laser circulating inside the resonator undergo mode splitting leading to two new lasing modes in different colors. Monitoring the changes in the color difference (frequency difference) enables detecting and measuring of nanoparticles with single particle resolution.



Washington University in St. Louis Newsroom:
Engineers develop new sensor to detect tiny individual nanoparticles​,
Tony Fitzpatrick

Read more…

GPS, Mr. Clocks and Relativity...

Hafele and Keating with two Mr. Clocks on their initial flight.

In 1971—16 years after Einstein’s death—the definitive experiment to test Einstein’s relativity was finally carried out. It required not a rocket launch but eight round-the-world plane tickets that cost the United States Naval Observatory, funded by taxpayers, a total of $7,600.



The brainchild of Joseph Hafele (Washington University in St. Louis) and Richard Keating (United States Naval Observatory) were “Mr. Clocks,” passengers on four round-the-world flights. (Since the Mr. Clocks were quite large, they were required to purchase two tickets per flight. The accompanying humans, however, took up only one seat each as they sat next to their attention-getting companions.)



The Mr. Clocks had all been synchronized with the atomic clock standards at the Naval Observatory before flight. They were, in effect, the “twins” (or quadruplets, in this case) from Einstein’s famous twin paradox, wherein one twin leaves Earth and travels nearly at the speed of light. Upon returning home, the traveling twin finds that she is much younger than her earthbound counterpart.



In fact, a twin traveling at 80 percent the speed of light on a round-trip journey to the Sun’s nearest stellar neighbor, Proxima Centauri, would arrive home fully four years younger than her sister. Although it was impossible to make the Mr. Clocks travel at any decent percentage of the speed of light for such a long time, physicists could get them going at jet speeds—about 300 meters (0.2 mile) per second, or a millionth the speed of light—for a couple of days. In addition, they could get the Mr. Clocks out of Earth’s gravitational pit by about ten kilometers (six miles) relative to sea level. And with the accuracy that the Mr. Clocks were known to be capable of, the time differences should be easy to measure.



Discovery: Like GPS? Thank Relativity.

Read more…

Quantum Walks...

Image source: Science Mag - 2D Walk Simulation

Abstract



We formalize a notion of discrete Lorentz transforms for quantum walks (QW) and quantum cellular automata (QCA), in (1 + 1)-dimensional discrete spacetime. The theory admits in diagrammatic representation in terms of a few local, circuit equivalence rules. Within this framework, we show that the first-order-only covariance of the Dirac QW. We then introduce the clock QW and the clock QCA, and prove that are exactly discrete Lorentz covariant. The theory also allows for non-homogeneous Lorentz transforms, between non-inertial frames.

Keywords: discrete Lorentz transformation, local Lorentz covariance, circuit transformation



New Journal of Physics:
Discrete Lorentz covariance for quantum walks and quantum cellular automata


Pablo Arrighi 1,2, Stefano Facchini 1 and Marcelo Forets 1
1. Univ Grenoble Alpes, LIG, F-38000 Grenoble, France
2. Université de Lyon, LIP, 46 allée dʼItalie, F-69008 Lyon, France
Read more…

Cygnus, Michell and Uhuru...

Source: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

"A black hole is a volume of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it. This astonishing idea was first announced in 1783 by John Michell, an English country parson. Although he was one of the most brilliant and original scientists of his time, Michell remains virtually unknown today, in part because he did little to develop and promote his own path-breaking ideas.



"Michell was born in 1724 and studied at Cambridge University, where he later taught Hebrew, Greek, mathematics, and geology. No portrait of Michell exists, but he was described as “a little short man, of black complexion, and fat.” He became rector of Thornhill, near Leeds, where he did most of his important work. Michell had numerous scientific visitors at Leeds, including Benjamin Franklin, the chemist Joseph Priestley (who discovered oxygen), and the physicist Henry Cavendish (who discovered hydrogen).

"The range of his scientific achievements is impressive. In 1750, Michell showed that the magnetic force exerted by each pole of a magnet decreases with the square of the distance. After the catastrophic Lisbon earthquake of 1755, he wrote a book that helped establish seismology as a science. Michell suggested that earthquakes spread out as waves through the solid Earth and are related to the offsets in geological strata now called faults. This work earned him election in 1760 to the Royal Society, an organization of leading scientists.

"Michell conceived the experiment and built the apparatus to measure the force of gravity between two objects of known mass. Cavendish, who actually carried out the experiment after Michell’s death, gave him full credit for the idea. The measurement yielded a fundamental physical quantity called the gravitational constant, which calibrates the absolute strength of the force of gravity everywhere in the universe. Using the measured value of the constant, Cavendish was able for the first time to calculate the mass and the average density of the Earth.

"Michell was also the first to apply the new mathematics of statistics to astronomy. By studying how the stars are distributed on the sky, he showed that many more stars appear as pairs or groups than could be accounted for by random alignments. He argued that these were real systems of double or multiple stars bound together by their mutual gravity. This was the first evidence for the existence of physical associations of stars.

"But perhaps Michell’s most far-sighted accomplishment was to imagine the existence of black holes. The idea came to him in 1783 while considering a hypothetical method to determine the mass of a star. Michell accepted Newton’s theory that light consists of small material particles. He reasoned that such particles, emerging from the surface of a star, would have their speed reduced by the star’s gravitational pull, just like projectiles fired upward from the Earth. By measuring the reduction in the speed of the light from a given star, he thought it might be possible to calculate the star’s mass." 1

Description and excerpt from 1, see also 2 and 3


"The Earth's atmosphere is opaque to X-rays. To determine whether astronomical objects emit such short wavelengths of light, an X-ray telescope must be carried aloft. The first X-ray observatory was an admirably international effort, orbited by the United States from an Italian launch platform in the Indian Ocean off the coast of Kenya and named Uhuru, the Swahili word for "freedom." In 1971, Uhuru discovered a remarkably bright X-ray source in the constellation of Cygnus, the Swan, flickering on and off a thousand times a second. The source, called Cygnus X-1, must therefore be very small...Something the size of an asteroid is a brilliant, blinking source of X-rays, visible over interstellar distances. What could it possibly be?"

Carl Sagan, Cosmos (book excerpt): Chapter IX - The Lives of the Stars



1. American Museum of Natural History:
Case Study - John Michell and Black Holes
2. American Physical Society:
November 27, 1783: John Michell anticipates black holes
3. IO9: The forgotten genius who discovered black holes over 200 years ago

Read more…

Once Again...



I'll be in the state of Texas eating good barbecue and visiting with family and friends. Though it is where this blog was "born" and I will have access to the Internet and email, in the words of my character namesake, it is quite logical for me to take a respite from work-related and recreational usage of URLs, and actually read books made of papyrus near a pool.



Please enjoy all the previous posts. I will see you back online 8 September.


...................."\\//_"....................



"Dif tor heh smusma."
Read more…

Keeling Curve...

Source: Greg Laden's Science Blog

As told by the American Museum of Natural History (went there two weeks ago for my birthday):

Related sites:

Climate Central: Keeling Curve
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

NOAA: Earth System Research Laboratory
Scripps CO2 Program: Home of the Keeling Curve
Scripps Institution of Oceanography: The Keeling Curve

Read more…

Quantum Physics and Breathing...

Image source: Renewing All Things

(Inside Science) – Why don't we suffocate whenever we try to take a breath? An international team of scientists has used quantum mechanics – the science that usually deals with events at the level of the ultra-small – to solve this human-sized mystery.



Quantum mechanics has long proved its value in understanding such phenomena as the behavior of electrons and in classifying subatomic particles. But in recent years theorists have increasingly shown how it applies to all facets of life, large and small.



The new research, led by Cédric Weber of Kings College, London and reported in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, confirms that point.



"This work," said team member David O'Regan, a physicist at Ireland's Trinity College, Dublin, "helps to illustrate the fact that quantum-mechanical effects, which may sometimes be viewed as somehow very exotic or only relevant under extreme conditions, are at play in the day-to-day regimes where biology, chemistry, and materials science operate."



The paper's titled: "Renormalization of myoglobin–ligand binding energetics by quantum many-body effects." That's a mouthful, I know but you're a sharp crowd knowing you've read this far.



Side note: this is the National Academy of Sciences, started March 3, 1863 by President Abraham Lincoln.



They use a technique - Density Functional Theory, or DFT, which won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1998, and its extension Density Mean-Field Theory. Some excerpts:



"DFT has been the standard tool for simulating electronic properties of materials and molecules for a number of years," O'Regan said.



The team used the technique to study reactions between the iron atom inside myoglobin and a molecule of oxygen or carbon monoxide. These reactions involve electrostatics, the arrangement of electric charges in atoms and molecules. When the iron atom transfers negative electric charges to an oxygen or carbon monoxide molecule, it enables the molecule to attach itself to the entire myoglobin protein.



Unfortunately, the theory consistently predicted that carbon monoxide should bind to myoglobin much more readily than oxygen.



"Using DMFT, we showed that, in fact, close to one electron is transferred to the oxygen molecule," Cole explained. "This provides much greater electrostatic stabilization than previously thought. It means that our estimate of the relative binding of oxygen and carbon dioxide is now in excellent agreement with experiment."



The analysis revealed that an effect called entanglement plays a critical role in binding oxygen molecules to the protein. Entanglement is a quintessential characteristic of quantum mechanics that links pairs of electrons so strongly that they no longer act independently. The process also involves Hund's exchange, another quantum-mechanical property that previous simulations had ignored.



The research has potential uses beyond understanding the molecular basis of breathing. According to Cole, the better understanding of how molecules bind to iron-containing proteins could help the drug-development process and possibly facilitate the design of artificial photosynthesis devices that would capture and store energy from the sun.



Impact: Supplying oxygen to the International Space Station would be a good low-orbital beta test platform. We could terraform our own planet, that we seem determined to do with the burning of fossil fuels anyway - our photosynthesis devices could remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and supply us with oxygen as its byproduct - we kind of need that. If we could do that, settling the Moon, Mars or any other planet would be a lot simpler once we engineer faster propulsion systems than we have currently. On Earth, "Green Tech" could literally mean converting solar energy into chemical energy useful to us as farmed (as in food) or mined resources. These are inevitably a dwindling supply and the basis for our current inequality hierarchy and scarcity economics. Please read the rest of the article at the link for more information.



Inside Science: How Quantum Mechanics Helps Us Breathe, Peter Gwynne

Read more…

The EmDrive That Wasn't...

The EmDrive produces propulsion without propellant, according to its inventor. (Credit: SPR, Ltd)

Physicist John Baez has another, more colorful word to describe the spate of recent reports about a breakthrough space engine that produces thrust without any propellant. The word starts with “bull–.” I won’t finish it, this being a family-friendly web site and all. Baez himself has softened his tone and now calls it “baloney,” though his sentiment remains the same: The laws of physics remain intact, and the “impossible” space drive is, as far as anyone can tell, actually impossible.



The story begins several years back with a British inventor named Roger Shawyer and his EmDrive, a prototype rocket engine which he claimed generated thrust by bouncing microwaves around in an enclosed metal funnel. Since no mass or energy emerged from the engine, Shawyer’s claim was another way of saying that he’d found a way to violate the conservation of momentum. In Baez’s words, “this is about as plausible as powering a spaceship by having the crew push on it from the inside.” Shawyer argued that he was exploiting a loophole within general relativity. Baez calls his explanation “mumbo jumbo.”



I'd read about the EmDrive, and didn't blog about it, thankfully. Something about it didn't "smell right," and it put me in the mind of the whole "cold fusion" boondoggle of the late 80's - early 90's. Plus, I ran into some links that gave a "404" error, which if you're trying to convince someone to fund your project is probably not a good sell! Surprisingly, a few courageous ones are still doing work in the area. As my Air Force JROTC instructor was apt to say to disavow responsibility or knowledge in any subject: "not the kid!"



This is not to be confused with warp drive. That science is actually being done painstakingly, and the reporting as accurate as possible. Meaning: as science goes, one must report the failures as well as the successes and subject your study to ruthless peer review. It's the science equivalent of a gauntlet at a bar fight. Even 1/10th the speed of light would be a significant accomplishment, and get us to at least Alpha Centauri in a human lifetime. It would at least reduce Mars to a matter of minutes (I'll leave space tourism to the visionary).



The author, Corey S. Powell, ends his article with an appropriate Latin metaphor. The rest of the article is at the link below:



"Ad astra per aspera: through hardship, to the stars."



Discovery: Did NASA Validate an “Impossible” Space Drive? In a Word, No.
Cory S. Powell

Read more…

Spin Symmetry...

Illustration of symmetry in the magnetic properties—or nuclear spins—of strontium atoms. JILA researchers observed that if two atoms have the same nuclear spin state (top), they interact weakly, and the interaction strength does not depend on which of the 10 possible nuclear spin states are involved. If the atoms have different nuclear spin states (bottom), they interact much more strongly, and, again, always with the same strength.
Credit: Ye and Rey groups and Steve Burrows/JILA

Just as diamonds with perfect symmetry may be unusually brilliant jewels, the quantum world has a symmetrical splendor of high scientific value.



Confirming this exotic quantum physics theory, JILA physicists led by theorist Ana Maria Rey and experimentalist Jun Ye have observed the first direct evidence of symmetry in the magnetic properties—or nuclear “spins”—of atoms. The advance could spin off practical benefits such as the ability to simulate and better understand exotic materials exhibiting phenomena such as superconductivity (electrical flow without resistance) and colossal magneto-resistance (drastic change in electrical flow in the presence of a magnetic field).



The JILA discovery, described in Science Express,* was made possible by the ultra-stable laser used to measure properties of the world’s most precise and stable atomic clock.** JILA is jointly operated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Colorado Boulder.

“Spin symmetry has a very strong impact on materials science, as it can give rise to unexpected behaviors in quantum matter,” JILA/NIST Fellow Jun Ye says. “Because our clock is this good—really it’s the laser that’s this good—we can probe this interaction and its underlying symmetry, which is at a very small energy scale.”


Read more…

If You Meet The Buddha...

Source: Ha Ha! Funny! LOL!

Question:
I have heard the phrase “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him!” many times. Can you explain this?

Answer:

It actually comes from an old koan attributed to Zen Master Linji, (the founder of the Rinzai sect). It’s a simple one:

“If you meet the Buddha, kill him.”– Linji

I’m sure you already realize that it’s not being literal. The road, the killing, and even the Buddha are symbolic.

The road is generally taken to mean the path to Enlightenment; that might be through meditation, study, prayer, or just some aspect of your way of life. Your life is your road. That’s fairly straightforward as far as metaphors go.

But how do you meet the Buddha on this “road?” Imagine meeting some symbolic Buddha. Would he be a great teacher that you might actually meet and follow in the real world? Could that Buddha be you yourself, having reached Enlightenment? Or maybe you have some idealized image of perfection that equates to your concept of the Buddha or Enlightenment.

Whatever your conception is of the Buddha, it’s WRONG! Now kill that image and keep practicing. This all has to do with the idea that reality is an impermanent illusion. If you believe that you have a correct image of what it means to be Enlightened, then you need to throw out (kill) that image and keep meditating.

Most people have heard the first chapter of the Tao, “The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.” (So if you think you see the real Tao, kill it and move on).

Source: Bryan Schell

Science: "the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment" (Oxford); also defined succinctly with subject examples here.



For the record: I am not a Buddhist. My fascination in this quote stems from the old "Kung Fu" series with David Carradine, (who was great, but I think in all fairness should have been the show's concept originator - Bruce Lee, oh well). It's also how this "Buddha murder" coincides with the scientific enterprise, and may explain the stress felt by this contradiction in other human endeavors.

This statement, however captures the "messiness" and disturbing protocol of science: what was a scientific accepted norm, theory or "truth" can with further (and, hopefully better-controlled) experimentation can be thrown away, discarded like previous theories regarding the speed of light (the Michelson-Morley Experiment). Science in the 19th Century looked at the universe as a mechanical, physical balance. Thus, Michelson and Morley tried to measure this balance, the stationary luminiferous aether: waves were transmitted in water; sound in air; light must be in the "aether wind." They "failed" to find it, but found something else; they "killed the [previous] Buddha."

From the site of Sci-Fi writer Peter Watts, he writes:

Science follows the creed of disproof, after all. The whole edifice is founded on the admission that everything we know might be wrong, that any of today’s "facts" might tomorrow be tested and found wanting. Science is pretty straightforward as a concept; in practice it’s messy as hell, full of arguments and counterarguments, noise and statistical filters. It’s a perfect target to those who crave certitude and simplicity: every dispute over detail can be twisted into an indictment of the entire process,...

Part of the enterprise is to learn something today you didn't know yesterday. If it is written down, and you want to refer to it as "science," then you have to lend the subject to scrutiny, criticism, relentless peer review and if found in error: disproving. If you require "steadiness," science can be a little disturbing, especially if its discoveries "kills" sacred Buddhas.



Michelson-Morley set the foundation for Einstein: first the Special Theory of Relativity (speed of light), then the General Theory (gravity). Einstein reluctantly contributed to Quantum Mechanics, which leads to modern micro-to-nano electronics and the laptops, flat screens, I-pads et al we now all enjoy. This set the stage for François Englert and Peter Higgs. They have hopefully, set the stage for those who will inevitably follow, making still new discoveries in their intellectual wake.

I watched the following TED Talk from Naomi Oreskes a while back. I initially didn't quite know then where to place it for a blog that promotes science curiosity and literacy - not that I didn't agree with it, but I now see as an appropriate denouement. Sourced from Physics Database, ending this discourse (and I am off to, of course "killing Buddhas"):
Read more…

TARDIS...

Source: Fan Pop

For Time And Relative Dimensions In Space, of course! I was introduced to The Doctor in the 80's by fellow Air Force Lieutenant Beth Richards: she hooked me on it. (If you're reading this Beth, I'm still a big fan.) The eleventh Doctor appears tonight, I think it's the same actor as in the other BBC series I follow, The Musketeers. I need to visit England again. Haven't been since 2000.

Although, "freezing" the TARDIS chameleon circuit in the shape of a London phone box/booth in the age of I-phones is complete nostalgia...most kids probably wouldn't know it if it materialized in front of them, landing on their foot! It used to make sense, trust me.



Found this Dr. Who special on Daily Motion. Enjoy!

Doctor-Who-7x98-Special-The-Science-of-Doctor-Who by jose-hita-9

BBC America: Doctor Who
Twitter: #newtowho


Tomorrow: If You Meet The Buddha

Read more…

Midsize Rarity...

An image of the starburst galaxy, Messier 82 (M82). (Courtesy: NASA, ESA and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA))

Astronomers in the US have used the flickering of X-rays to pin down the mass of a black hole in the nearby galaxy M82, finding the black hole to be about 400 times as massive as the Sun. This means it is of the rarest, mid-sized black-hole type, and raises the question of how these odd objects arise.

Mass is a fundamental property of any black hole, which has so much gravity that nothing can escape its grip. Black holes come in two main types: stellar-mass black holes that are roughly 10 times as massive as the Sun, such as Cygnus X-1, and supermassive black holes, which are typically millions or billions of times as massive as the Sun and inhabit the centres of large galaxies.

But there is a big gap between the two types. Intermediate-mass black holes "are much, much less studied compared with stellar and supermassive black holes," says Dheeraj Pasham, an astronomer at the University of Maryland in College Park. That is because intermediate-mass black holes are rare, with only one firm example ever identified.

Physics World: Nearby galaxy harbors rarest type of black hole

Read more…

Deep #Ferguson History...

"Just miles away from the scene of the protests in Ferguson lies the grave of Dred Scott at the Calvary Cemetery on West Florissant Avenue. Born a slave in Virginia, Scott sued in a St. Louis court for his freedom. The case went to the Supreme Court, resulting in a landmark 1857 decision that African Americans were not citizens of the United States and therefore had no rights to sue in federal courts. The court described blacks as "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." The Dred Scott Decision is considered by many to be the worst decision in the Supreme Court’s history."

My take: "Citizen's United" might give it a run for it's money!
Democracy Now!:
Ferguson Protests Erupt Near Grave of Ex-Slave Dred Scott, Whose Case Helped Fuel U.S. Civil War
PBS: Dred Scott case: the Supreme Court decision

Read more…

Kilobot...

Science: How Stuff Works

Fish gotta school, birds gotta flock, and robots, it seems, gotta swarm. At least, that’s what they’re doing on the workbench of Harvard University computer scientists Michael Rubenstein and Radhika Nagpal and Massachusetts Institute of Technology computer scientist Alejandro Cornejo. Each of their 1024 robots, called Kilobots, is a three-legged disk the size of a U.S. quarter, sporting a single curl of metallic hair. En masse, they form a mechanical multitude an order of magnitude larger than any robot swarm ever built—a possible precursor to future robot work squads choreographed for chores such as cleaning up oil spills.

“That is a beautiful accomplishment,” says Hod Lipson, a roboticist at Cornell University who was not involved with the work. “Really getting a thousand robots to perform in sort of perfect synchrony.”



The idea for swarms of robots working together comes from nature. Army ants link themselves together to form rafts and bridges, and neurons in a brain fire off signals that collectively create intelligence. They do it all by following collective algorithms—shared sets of rules and instructions—and taking their cues from what’s going on around them. Each individual is “just doing its own thing, locally. But fantastic things emerge out of their collective behavior,” Lipson says.



Science: Heads up for the gathering robot swarm, Angus Chen

Read more…